0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³úÇ÷°üÁúȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô Àû¿ë°¡´ÉÇÑ °£È£°á°ú ºÐ·ùü°èÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º °ËÁõ

Validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification on Cerebrovascular Patients

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 20±Ç 3È£ p.489 ~ 499
KMID : 0367020080200030489
±è¿µÈ­ ( Kim Young-Hwa ) - È­¼øÀü³²´ëÇб³º´¿ø

¼ÒÇâ¼÷ ( So Hyang-Sook ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
ÀÌÀºÁÖ ( Lee Eun-Joo ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
°íÀº ( Ko Eun ) - ¼Û¿ø´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance and contribution of 9 nursing outcomes and their indicators that could be applied to cerebrovascular patients.

Methods: Data were collected from 175 neurosurgical nurses working at two university affiliated hospitals and five secondary hospitals located in Gwang-ju. The Fehring method was used to estimate outcome content validity(OCV) and outcome sensitivity validity(OSV) of nursing outcomes and their indicators. Stepwise regression was used to evaluate relationship between outcome and its indicators.

Results: The core outcomes identified by the OCV were Tissue Perfusion: Cerebral, Nutritional Status, Neurological Status, and Wound Healing: Primary Intention, whereas highly supportive outcomes identified by the OSV were Oral Health, Self-Care: ADL, and Nutritional Status. All the critical indicators selected for Fehring method were not included in stepwise regression model. By stepwise regression analysis, the indicators explained outcomes from 19% to 52% in importance and from 21% to 45% in contribution.

Conclusion: This study identified core and supportive outcomes and their indicators which could be useful to assess the physical status of cerebrovascular patients. Further research is needed for the revision and development of nursing outcomes and their indicators at neurological nursing area.
KeyWords
Ÿ´çµµ, °£È£°á°ú ºÐ·ùü°è, ³úÇ÷°üÁúȯ
Validation, Nursing Outcomes Classification, Cerebrovascular disorder
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed